Reads markdown files and spellchecks them. Textlint: Offers markdown and natural language.MarkdownLint: Style checker and linting tool available in a few languages and as different integrations.Your editor, or as an integration in your editor (if possible). I will quickly list some of the options for tools you may want to use outside of Generation of a TOC and section numbering. Would like my editor and the static site generator to agree. img/banner.png, Jekyll expects /img/banner.png. For example, look at the folders in the pictureīelow, if I want to embed the image banner.png in my markdown file, mostĪpplications expect. That the editors I used and Jekyll (my static site generator) have differentĮxpectations for file paths. To remove egregious formatting mistakes, and ensure consistency.Ĭhecking validity of images. You may want to use automatic formatting on your document I want to use Github-flavoured markdownįormat on save. To be consistent between what you see in your preview, and what your target There isn’t that muchĭifference between markdown and its related variant syntaxes, but it is good Most applications have spellchecking by default, most IDEs Ensure that your markdown is correct.Īpplications don’t have this, you need to use an IDE with a linting plugin, Here are some tasks you may want to include to your workflow: Results when you transform your markdown to HTML, and push it to wherever you “Bug-free” publishing is ensuring that there are no unintended or undesirable I continue to use Typora for my drafts, and use VSCode for final editing and publication! “Bug-free” publishing I configured VSCode to get closer to my “bug free” publishing ideal. I will explain what is “bug-free” publishing for me, and what tools are available to help improve the quality of your markdown documents. Ideally, I would use one application to do everything, but realistically getting everything I want in one application is probably only possible if I configure an IDE to suit my preferences. And I would like some additional features such as adding a table of contents (TOC), anything that is a bit tedious to write manually, and can be error-prone. Typora covers most of what I want, but over time, I have found some syntax errors creep into my documents, which I didn’t always catch. I do a quick review locally in the browser, before I push it to Github, which takes care of publishing. It’s similar to a word processing application, it offers less distraction, I like using its “focus mode”, it has spellchecking, and shortcuts for formatting text. My personal preference is to do my writing in a desktop application called Typora. So, I decided to re-evaluate my workflow. I was getting some reoccurring issues when publishing my markdown documents, let’s just call them bugs for simplicity, I will discuss them in more detail later.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
Details
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |